Search for: "DOE et al v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 3,163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Not only should the First Amendment apply to the publication by Assange of Manning leaks – after all such publication was not dissimilar from that of the New York Times, the Guardian, et. al. [read post]
Can Deals That Do Not Trigger an HSR Filing Raise Antitrust Concerns? Yes, Buyer and Sellers Beware!
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Twin America, LLC, et. al, Twin America, Coach, and City Sights together were required to pay $7.5 million in disgorgement to remedy alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as New York State law, including the Donnelly Act (see Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
Smith & Nephew Inc. et al., case number 18-2140, the U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
Smith & Nephew Inc. et al., case number 18-2140, the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Targeted infrastructure funding is partly addressed by a Senate appropriations bill that devotes $690 million in fiscal year (FY) 2020 funding for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Utilities Service (RUS) broadband loan and grant programs (presumably including the ReConnect program). [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:55 pm
The Kraft Heinz Co. et al. in the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 1:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 7:38 am
Baker Petrolite, LLC et al – United States District Court – Southern District of Mississippi – October 22nd, 2019) involves a hydrochloric acid (HCI) spill. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 9:41 am
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Southern District of California – October 21st, 2019) involves a claim of false advertising and unfair competition. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:21 am
Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc et al – United States District Court – District of South Carolina – October 18th, 2019) involves a products liability case involved a CORE Bioflex athletic cup, manufactured by the defendant Shock Doctor and sold by the defendant Dick’s Sporting Goods. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
Cal.) and American Cable Ass’n et al. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 5:27 pm
In OSI Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
Weinstein et al. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
EEOC, et al., involves claims of discrimination based on transgender status. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case involving copyright in annotated legal code: Georgia, et al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:14 pm
” State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm
Page Keeton et al. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Ross Dress For Less, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Northern District of Oklahoma – September 11th, 2019) involves a premises liability claim. [read post]
