Search for: "David Samuel" Results 701 - 720 of 1,861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
” In Education Week, Christina Samuels and Mark Walsh look at the court’s decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm by David Kopel
Meyer, Networked Machinists: High-Technology Industries in Antebellum America (2006); David A. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
(David Ramos/Getty Images) Last week, I blogged about the criminal portions of Mark A. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 6:41 am
Martti Koskenniemi and transcendence in international law David Dyzenhaus, Formalism, realism and the politics of indeterminacy Nigel D. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage comes from Robert Barnes and Keith Alexander in The Washington Post, who report that “the two former prosecutors on the Supreme Court — Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Samuel A. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Helen Klein Murillo
Yates’s lawyer responded with letters to Acting Assistant Attorney General Samuel Ramer and White House Counsel Don McGahn asserting that Yates’s testimony was not privileged. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Associated Press, David Porter reports that “Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito told an audience Wednesday at an event sponsored by a Catholic lawyers’ organization” that the “U.S. is entering a period when its commitment to religious liberty is being tested,” and that it is “”up to all of us to evangelize our fellow Americans about the issue of religious freedom. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” In an essay in the Stanford Law Review Online, David Freeman Engstrom and Jonah Gelbach discuss California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
: Reexamining the Codification of "Islamic" Personal Status Law, 33 Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law 329-382 (2016).David L. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that “Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito agreed with part or all of the result on narrow grounds, but each filed a separate opinion expressing discomfort with voting-rights precedents protecting minority political power. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 10:23 am
” The breakthrough occurred in a patent issued to David Smith in 1853. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
Currently, Justice Samuel Alito is the only non-participant. [read post]