Search for: "Deas v. Deas"
Results 701 - 720
of 825
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2009, 9:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
See Page v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 12:47 pm
The federal judge found that the officers and the DEA agent gave conflicting statements as to when the cell phones were searched. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
United States v Hertular, April 7, 2009. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 6:43 am
Keehn v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 10:21 am
In Raber v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:39 pm
Shaygan by a DEA agent based upon Dr. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:39 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:59 pm
See[www.usdoj.gov]Commentary: The DEA has gotten quite aggressive in conducting periodic site inspections of its registrants which are authorized under 21 U.S.C. 822(f). [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 10:32 am
Maryland v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 10:13 am
Schmidt v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:02 am
Under Missouri v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:23 am
See Abdullahi v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 6:10 am
Here is how the issue came up:On February 11, 2008. . . the Defendant gave the DEA agents written consent to search that office. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 5:20 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 2:14 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
Officer who stopped defendant had independent probable cause from the DEA, so the stop was justified. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 8:14 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 7:18 am
A technical violation of the DEA's inventory policy did not justify suppression. [read post]
