Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 701 - 720 of 40,580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2013, 10:27 am by Docket Navigator
Hotels.com, et. al., 2-06-cv-00042 (TXED June 20, 2013, Order) (Gilstrap, J.). [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:47 am
The Nevada crime of attempted murder consists of two elements: 1) The defendant had the intention to kill the would-be victim, and 2) the defendant took a step towards carrying out the killing. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
United States, 22-5828Issues: (1) Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a federal court from basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on conduct for which a jury has acquitted defendant; and (2) whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a federal court from basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on conduct which was charged in a different jurisdiction, tried before a different court, overseen by a different judge, and for which the… [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
Defendant was convicted of all charges and was sentenced on three of the child sodomy charges to consecutive indeterminate terms of 12 1/2 to 25 years, with the sentences on other charges to run concurrently. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 1:06 pm by Jon Brodkin
Enlarge (credit: Bungie) Bungie slammed YouTube's Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) process in a lawsuit against 10 John Doe defendants accused of sending fraudulent takedown notices against Destiny 2 videos. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
However, if it does so, it is a deviation from the basic statutory formula and requires an analysis under the factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 240(1–b)(f). [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:55 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  According to the Opinion, the only evidence in the record of possible intoxication was that:  (1) the defendant allegedly drank two beers before the collision,  (2) the accident occurred at 2 a.m. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
Village of Suffern, 268 F.3d 65, 73 (2d Cir. 2001) (requiring a private citizen who sued a public official to show: “(1) [the plaintiff] has an interest protected by the First Amendment; (2) defendants’ actions were motivated or substantially caused by his exercise of that right; and (3) defendants’ actions effectively chilled the exercise of his First Amendment right”), with Johnson v. [read post]