Search for: "Design Homes, Inc." Results 701 - 720 of 3,466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2020, 11:06 am by Jane Chong
This includes smart home products and other “internet of things” devices that package the body with a faulty brain. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 2:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
   Solutions Law Press, Inc. invites you receive future updates by registering on our Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:49 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 21 November 2019. [read post]
Based on its research, 39% of employees reported they worked at home at least some of the time; in 2016, that percentage had risen to 43%. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 5:38 am
  At the same time universities have begun to ban overseas travel to designated states and to bring students home who are studying abroad. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:15 am by luiza
The rule is designed to discourage parasitic lawsuits, where the whistleblower is merely repeating public information. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:35 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Live-in home support workers are paid a daily rate and this rate is set to remain at $113.50 per day or part day worked. [read post]
  This notice period is designed to allow for time to review the agreement and negotiate the terms of their employment. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am by MBettman
Post Office Dep’t, 397 U.S. 728 (1970) (Upholding a statute that allowed a person to require mailers to remove the person’s name from its mailing list and stop all future mailings to the person’s home and finding that a vendor does not have a constitutional right to send unwanted material into the home of another.) [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am by MOTP
Because a provision not designed to be a penalty can nevertheless operate as one, our precedent requires a third step: courts must examine whether, at the time of the breach, an unbridgeable discrepancy exists between actual and liquidated damages.3 Because the breaching party in this case did not prove an “unbridgeable discrepancy” or otherwise demonstrate that the provision operated as a penalty, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. * * * We hold that, at the time… [read post]