Search for: "Distinctive Brands, Inc."
Results 701 - 720
of 1,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
Jacobsen Products Company Inc., where Qualitex manufactured pads for dry cleaning presses. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 12:13 pm
Employees were not required to wear a specific brand, style or design of shoes. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:25 am
See Yogubliz Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am
Martha Elizabeth, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Defining Presence Marketing Group, Inc. and Axel Ltd. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 9:50 am
The decision will be welcome news for brand owners seeking to rely on their RCDs to prevent competitors from creating and marketing look-alike products. [read post]
Specialty Healthcare framework consistent with NLRA, but regional director did not properly apply it
23 Nov 2016, 7:58 am
Operations, Inc. dba Woodbridge Winery v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
Holding, Inc., Docket No. 11-3303-cv. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
Holding, Inc., Docket No. 11-3303-cv. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Microsoft's argument was over a difference without distinction [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
Techsplosion, Inc., 261 F.3d 1188, 1193 (11th Cir. 2001) (quoting Tally-Ho, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
While the Confederate flag is not a brand in the commercial sense, both flags and brands attract loyalties and generate passions that are often irrational and difficult, if not impossible, to suppress, reflects Jeremy.* Why Finland is not Silicon Valley: farewell Matti Makkonen, the "father of SMS"Matti Makkonen, the Finnish father of SMS, passed away this week. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
, Inc v Jen, Chi [2019] SGIPOS 3. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
Plasteak, Inc. et al. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:43 pm
In DSPT Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) Global - Trade Marks / Brands The branding Summer of our content and discontent (IPKat) Brands and obesity: How do innovation and regulation fit in? [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
He also held that, although Nike clearly used its NIKE brand for the campaign, it had also used LDNR “in relation to” clothing, and there was also evidence of actual confusion. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:51 am
Intendis, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:55 am
., Inc., 2023 WL 3556053, No. 21-2149-cv, --- F.4th ---- (2d Cir. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
In 2016, companies and brands aren’t just tweeting about the Olympics. [read post]
