Search for: "Distinctive Brands, Inc."
Results 701 - 720
of 1,242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2014, 3:28 am
Professional Gallery, Inc., Opposition No. 91173411 [Opposition to FLAG-IT! [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
This should serve as important lesson in branding. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:12 am
They might be, and often are; but goods, being tangible, always have tangible branding at some point. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 11:12 pm
By the way, are you able to identify the brand of drone shown in the photo above? [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 6:03 am
” Defendants cited Lindy Pen Co., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
Pfizer, Inc., No. 12-60861, 2014 WL 661058 (5th Cir. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:00 am
As the case comes to us, the commercial/noncommercial distinction is potentially dispositive. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
Hearst Holdings Inc & Another v A.V.E.L.A. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
NFL Films, Inc., 542 F.3d 1007, 1014–15 (3d Cir. 2008). [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
Generally, all these websites do is express discontent with a certain brand, disparaging or tarnishing the companies’ trademarks as they complain away. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
Generally, all these websites do is express discontent with a certain brand, disparaging or tarnishing the companies’ trademarks as they complain away. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
Generally, all these websites do is express discontent with a certain brand, disparaging or tarnishing the companies’ trademarks as they complain away. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Not only is the exterior labelled 'Dumb Starbucks', but inside almost exactly replicates every aspect of one of the most recognised (and valuable) brands in the world - the paper cups, the drinks sizes, the menu, the easy-listening CDs for sale. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:18 am
Samara Brothers, Inc. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
February 19, 2014 - 2 PM: In re Drew Estate Holding Company LLC, Serial No. 77840485 [Section 2(e)(3) refusal to register KUBA KUBA BY DREW ESTATE on the ground that the mark is primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of "Cigars made with Cuban seed tobacco"] [Note that in In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate 97 USPQ2d 1640 (TTAB 2011) [precedential], the Board found the mark KUBA KUBA to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of cigars].February… [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
On the other hand, Hargis argues that the above distinctions are illusory. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
As to the involved goods and services, the Board found helpful its decision in The Conde Nast Publications Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Co-op., Inc. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:13 am
It’s a 10, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:56 am
., Inc., 842 F.2d 643, 648 (2d Cir. 1988). [read post]
