Search for: "District of Columbia v. Little"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am
As discussed here, in June 2012, Central District of California Judge R. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm
Screws v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:46 am
Columbia Broadcasting System, 415 U.S. 394 (1974).693 F.2d 622 (7th Cir. 1982).593 F.Supp. 808 (D. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
By virtue of regulations adopted in 2000, the District of Columbia required all marital children to bear the surnames of their fathers. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed, finding that such boycotts were significantly expressive such that an ad hoc balancing of the competing interests presented in the particular case was necessary. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, is perhaps best known for her libertarian-like dissent in Nike v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
There are any number of cases (like this one from 2006 in the District of Columbia) that suggest that the only “content” in an email communication, for example, is the subject line and the body of the message. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 3:32 am
Old-timers will have flashbacks of controversial Rule 19c-4 - which was adopted in 1988 to limit the ability of companies to deviate from "one share, one vote" - and which was struck down in 1990 by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:25 am
To date, 49 states and the District of Columbia have passed some form of a shield law or recognize some level of privilege for reporters. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
Columbia Records v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
As the Supreme Court noted, 12 states and the District of Columbia now permit same-sex marriage; that means the great majority of employers are facing some pretty daunting questions about exactly who is entitled to spousal- and family-related benefits and protections under federal law. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
As the Supreme Court noted, 12 states and the District of Columbia now permit same-sex marriage; that means the great majority of employers are facing some pretty daunting questions about exactly who is entitled to spousal- and family-related benefits and protections under federal law. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:13 am
Columbia Mutual Insurance Co., Besic v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:58 pm
Supreme Court’s 1947 opinion in Walling v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:13 am
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois 1999). [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of Marcia Coyle’s The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution (Simon & Schuster, May 2013). [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm
On Tuesday in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
