Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 701 - 720
of 2,061
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2017, 8:10 am
If the Court rules that American Pipe does not apply to statutes of repose, that may provide corporate defendants some protection against what can be lengthy periods of potential uncertain liability where putative class actions can take years to resolve. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
Acorda Therapeutics, et al., No. 16-360 (does an ANDA filing create nationwide specific jurisdiction?) [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 10:16 pm
As for the first factor, the purpose and character of the use, Judge Klausner found that Defendants’ use was not transformative, as it does not have a further purpose or different character, nor does it alter the original Star Trek works with new expression, meaning, or message, as required by Campbell v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:57 am
., “Uniform with a gold shirt” and “Triangular medals on uniform”), settings (the planet Axanar and the Klingon planet Qo’noS), as well as space docks and the Starship Enterprise, the Federation logos, and plot point similarities, including the concept of dilithium, phasers and the Klingon Empire.** **See * above. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Following on from march's reports on the 'Star Trek' case, Marie-Andree wrote an excellent piece on whether or not the Star Trek rights owners were right to argue that the Klingon Language, “Klingonese or Klingon, the native language of Qo’noS” could be protected by copyright. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 6:12 pm
The latest issue of the Journal of International Trade Law and Policy (Vol. 15, nos. 2/3, 2016) is out. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 3:17 am
Plaintiffs claim that these works are not “fan films” but rather unlicensed professional productions, and that they take place in the “alien star systems created by Plaintiffs, on spaceships belonging to the United Federation of Planets, on Klingon battlecruisers fighting the Klingon Empire, and on planets such as Qo’nos, Vulcan and Axanar” (Plaintiffs’ motion p. 21 and 22). [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:47 pm
Although the court does not come right out and say it, this is fundamentally a theory of causality in inducement. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm
App. 1936): Where deed described land as “the lot, a parcel of ground, situated in Knoxville, Tennessee, known and described under house Nos. 1209 and 1211 Western Avenue. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm
App. 1936): Where deed described land as “the lot, a parcel of ground, situated in Knoxville, Tennessee, known and described under house Nos. 1209 and 1211 Western Avenue. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:14 am
Patent Nos. 6,151,604 and 6,163,775 (inventions relating to a “self-referential” database). [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:11 pm
” Based on this comparison, it has been argued that the BWSSB decision does not form a judgment in the eyes of the law because of the circumstances of the case. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:25 pm
” Based on this comparison, it has been argued that the BWSSB decision does not form a judgment in the eyes of the law because of the circumstances of the case. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 7:58 am
In this sense, this draft does not reproduce Article 107 of Brazilian Foreigners’ Statute and any other article that limits any fundamental right of migrants in Brazil. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:07 am
” “Unfortunately,” the Court of Appeals stated “there does not appear to be any case law providing guidance as to when a denial of all services including even supervised visitation is an abuse of discretion, and as noted above, neither the magistrate nor the judge provided any grounds for that denial other than that it had the discretion to do so. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
Sun Earth Solar Power Co., Ltd., Ninth Circuit Case Nos. 13-17622, 15-16906, slip op. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
Sun Earth Solar Power Co., Ltd., Ninth Circuit Case Nos. 13-17622, 15-16906, slip op. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 7:51 am
., Nos. 15-2145 and 15-2147. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am
Nor did Janowiec v Russia (2013) App nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09 assist the claimant. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 3:36 am
The Board rejected applicant's argument because the Cole Memo "does not and cannot override the CSA. [read post]
