Search for: "Does 1-2, inclusive"
Results 701 - 720
of 4,357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 5:43 pm
Also, under 8 CFR 204.5(e): “Retention of section 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) priority date. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 12:19 am
Also, under 8 CFR 204.5(e): “Retention of section 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) priority date. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:50 pm
Also, under 8 CFR 204.5(e): “Retention of section 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) priority date. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:25 pm
Also, under 8 CFR 204.5(e): “Retention of section 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) priority date. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:23 am
Also, under 8 CFR 204.5(e): “Retention of section 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) priority date. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
Germany (2005) 40 EHRR 1. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:00 am
” Speaking of small issuers, what child of the 1970s & 1980s does not have a soft spot for Ronco? [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:35 pm
Service shall be as provided by R. 4:67-3.4:84-2. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:31 am
But 35 USC 102(g) does exist. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:27 pm
For publication opinions today (1): In Martha S. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 7:34 pm
” A couple of observations: 1. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 1:29 am
Copying and availability of copiesAnother aspect of the Irish proposal is that a copy made for the purpose of non-commercial research of a work which was, at the time when the copy was made, available without an access restriction would not be regarded as infringing, irrespective of whether that work continues to be so available after that time.In any case, the draft exception requires that the copy made: (1) is not transferred to any other person, except where the transfer is authorised by… [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am
This bill clarifies and redefines who is entitled to file a change application, i.e.: (1) a holder on an approved but unperfected application to appropriate water; (2) the record owner of a perfected water right; (3) a person who has written authorization from a person described in (1) or (2) above to file the application of that person's behalf; and (4) a shareholder in a water company who files in accordance with the existing "Shareholder Change… [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:03 am
DefinitionsArticle 2. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm
The plaintiffs, respondents in the Supreme Court, alleged that Comcast violated sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act by “clustering” its services in the Philadelphia market, a practice it implemented through agreements to swap regions with competitor cable systems. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 7:33 am
Here's my set of observations:1. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:21 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada has identified six non-exhaustive factors to assist a court‘s fairness inquiry: (1) the purpose of the dealing; (2) the character of the dealing; (3) the amount of the dealing; (4) alternatives to the dealing; (5) the nature of the work; and (6) the effect of the dealing on the work. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:42 am
With regard to small business lending, the Bureau focused on assessing whether (1) there is discrimination in application, underwriting, and pricing processes, (2) creditors are redlining, and (3) there are weaknesses in fair lending related compliance management systems. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:14 am
The present VODP is similar to the ones held before with these following points: 1. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:58 am
This post summarizes published decisions from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that may be of interest to state criminal practitioners from November, 2019. (1) Motion in limine to prohibit the use of the word “robbery” by government witnesses properly denied; (2) No error to deny mistrial following witness’s emotional outburst; (3) Pretrial publicity did not rise to the level of creating a presumption of prejudice and defendant failed to show actual prejudice;… [read post]
