Search for: "Does 1-88"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
In order to establish a deprivation of a property right in violation of substantive due process, the claimant must establish (1) a cognizable or vested property interest, not the mere hope of one, and (2) that the municipality acted " without legal justification and motivated entirely by political concerns'" (Bower Assoc. v Town of Pleasant Val., 2 NY3d at 627, quoting Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 53). [read post]
14 May 2011, 11:01 am
The scope of the term “comprising substantially” is therefore interpreted as being identical to that of “consisting essentially of” (see T 472/88 [3]). [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm
The Court found that such an action does not involve the assessment of facts or the application of rules and practices of the locus rei sitae in such a way as to justify conferring jurisdiction on a court of the State in which the property is situated (Case C-722 Reitbauer, [48]; see also C-115/88 Reichert I, [12]). [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:22 pm
(b)1. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
However, the board does not consider that the content of I1 was divulged to the public by the fact that the notary public had seen it before the filing date. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
If this is thought to be a problem, the answer does not lie, it is submitted, in a distorted interpretation and application of that statutory regime. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:06 pm
This one does make some sense. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:04 am
The 88 yr old was shot. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:38 am
Figure 1: Two Components of Discovery Data Discovery: Insight from Data Creation to Collection From this high-level framework, one can then add a layer of critical automation processes and tasks. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
This does not amount to determination. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
[…] Refusal of the application at this stage is justified and does not violate the applicants right to be heard (A 113(1)). [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:32 am
As mentioned above, the DOL’s budget justification as to the OFCCP does call on the agency to draft and review: (1) legislative proposals to amend VEVRAA and Section 503; and (2) a new Executive Order amending EO 11246. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
Institutions who resist providing information should be reminded of the Board’s powers pursuant to subsection 66.7(1) of the Copyright Act.Q. 10/10, 49/50, 88/89, 103/104: the questions as reformulated shall be answered. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:44 pm
This section does not specifically address whether ICBC needs to pay for travel expenses. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm
That is the question the Board had to deal with in the present decision.Claim 1 of the main request read:1. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:32 am
Nos. 1, ~~ 2-6, and 33). [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 2:13 pm
The Christ Hospital, Case: 1:23-cv-00031-DRC at¶ 88. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 2:42 pm
See In re A.S., 261 S.W.3d 76, 88 (Tex. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Wong, 68 Haw. 1, 10–11, 702 P.2d 299, 306 (1985). [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
Secretary of Defense by a vote of 98-1. [read post]
