Search for: "Does I & II" Results 701 - 720 of 23,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2008, 10:37 am
  In particular, it means that Article II:2 does not set out exceptions to the positive obligations contained in Article II:1(b). [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 12:34 pm
”The relevant amendments are as follows:11 Section 83 is amended by adding the following subsections:(3) For the purposes of this Part, property received by a spouse from a trust in respect of the spouse's beneficial interest in property held in the trust must be considered to be property derived from that beneficial interest.(4) In this Part, "property" includes a beneficial interest in property unless a contrary intention appears.12 Section 84 is amended(a) by repealing subsection… [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am by Benjamin Wittes
 I agree—and so does nearly everyone else. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:13 am by admin
A Few Interesting, Frequent and Important Competition and Advertising Law Questions – Part II Q:  COMPETITION LAW & JOINT VENTURES: “I understand that ‘cartels’ (e.g, price-fixing agreements) between competing companies are illegal, but what about ‘joint ventures’? [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:00 am by Renae Lloyd
CV REIT I and II Merger, Decrease in NAV After Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 12:05 pm
   The District Court Opinion of Judge Carnes does not reference any "tactics," demeaning or otherwise. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 9:15 pm
But such discretion does create a serious potential for abuse. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 8:28 am
It claims that there are 39 other states in the country that have adopted this exception to hearsay.How does it play out in your courtrooms? [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 2:18 pm by Dan
" It does a great job in explaining the current situation surrounding China's plans to require foreigners contribute to China's social insurance. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Doe involves almost precisely the same issue as what was before the Court in a case I had years ago and lost 7-0, in an unpublished opinion, whereas Doe only lost 5-2. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:31 pm
[6/09/09 Update:  See also my analysis of the Chrysler Sale Opinion (Part I) and (Part II).] [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:03 pm by George
While I may be studying for the California Bar Exam this summer, it does’t mean I can’t vicariously attend each and every one of these SF Events. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 3:46 pm by Scott Grabel
If the DEA does approve rescheduling of marijuana, no doubt it will have a substantial impact on the medical marijuana industry in Michigan. [read post]