Search for: "Dukes v. Dukes"
Results 701 - 720
of 3,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
In Cruz v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:00 am
Here is the abstract:In deciding Meredith v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:15 pm
Supreme Court Reverses Ninth Circuit in Dukes v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:23 am
The current case is Dukes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:11 am
Very broadly reading the terms of the 2009 Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 11:38 am
Ten months after originally doing so, divided three-judge Ninth Circuit panel again affirms the class certification order in Dukes v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:39 am
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:55 pm
” Wal-Mart v Dukes. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 2:30 am
Richard Schmalbeck (Duke) passed along the Top 44 law schools by academic peer reputation in the just-released 2009 U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:52 am
The case—Dukes v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 7:27 am
The issues in Dukes v Deaton were whether a police officer who threw a diversionary device known as a “flashbang” into a dark room occupied by two sleeping individuals without first visually inspecting the room is entitled to qualified immunity against a section 1983 lawsuit claiming excessive force and whether the officer was entitled to qualified immunity against a complaint of assault and battery. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Dukes. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:39 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:40 am
The symposium will assess the implications of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Glossip v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Many of those signing on were on the professors' brief filed in Matrixx v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:19 am
Dukes adopted a narrow interpretation of the commonality requirement in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a), and its decision in AT& T Mobility v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 6:25 am
Maatman, Jr. and Laura Maechtlen As previewed in prior posts, we were honored by BNA's request that Seyfarth's class action practitioners author an analysis of the SCOTUS ruling in Dukes, et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:42 pm
Lawyers: DNA Not Linked to Duke Athletes [Associated Press via Instapundit] Earlier: The Duke Rape Case: The DNA Evidence [read post]
