Search for: "EXXON CORPORATION"
Results 701 - 720
of 822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2008, 9:04 am
MOBIL CHEMICAL COMPANY, A DIVISION OF EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, JAMES BOWSER AND RANDALL ROY; from Jefferson County; 9th district (09-06-00568-CV, 254 SW3d 602, 05-01-08, pet. denied) (Justice O'Neill not sitting) (employment law)(summary judgment for defendant employer affirmed in suit in which former employee brought claims of infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and retaliation.) [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 3:55 pm
Scientific-Atlanta Inc., No. 06-43, and Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 7:01 am
As reported on LegalNewsline, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing yesterday entitled "Courting Big Business: The Supreme Court's Recent Decisions on Corporate Misconduct and Laws Regulating Corporations. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:27 pm
As reported in the Worcester Telegram, a federal court jury in Nevada awarded $60 million in punitive damages against Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and UnumProvident Corporation in a case for wrongful denial of a disability claim. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:26 pm
The Court was equally divided on the first issue of corporate liability for punitive damages. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:26 pm
The Court was equally divided on the first issue of corporate liability for punitive damages. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:44 am
Souter Causes Stir With Footnote in 'Exxon' Case
Legal Times
The footnote was easy to miss. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 2:27 pm
See Exxon Shipping Company, et al v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 3:20 am
" Symbolically, the case of Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 4:32 pm
" Symbolically, the case of Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:35 pm
While the Court sharply limited the maritime punitive damages award in Exxon v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 3:13 pm
Exxon Mobil Corporation, No. 07-CA-2371. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:53 am
Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
No real surprise here, but with three terms now under his belt, it's becomingly painfully clear that the promises John Roberts made during his Supreme Court confirmation hearings to be an impartial umpire without an agenda were just lip service.Particularly in the wake of the conservative triumvirate sledgehammer the high court unleashed upon this nation this past week - making clear that wealthy corporations can afford to wantonly destroy the environment (Exxon Valdez case),… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:02 pm
Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:28 pm
Once again, when push came to shove in the biggest cases of the term (Guantanamo detainees, gun rights, the death penalty for child rapists, punitive damages for the Exxon Valdez, and the millionaires' amendment to the campaign finance laws), the Court was maximally divided with Justice Kennedy holding the deciding vote. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:20 pm
Indeed, Exxon testified at trial that the original punitive damage award of $5 billion "would not have a material impact on the corporation or its credit quality. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 2:03 pm
" The newspaper also contains an editorial entitled "Exxon verdict: Supreme Court makes life easier for corporate wrong-doers. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:58 pm
Most consumers, especially residents of Alaska who's lives were forever harmed by this large corporation, see this slashing of damages as a big corporate slap in the face! [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 8:35 am
Supreme Court Reduces Damages Awarded in Exxon Case
Legal Times
A punitive damage award in the Exxon Valdez oil spill case that once amounted to $5 billion was knocked down to $507.5 million by the Supreme Court on Wednesday. [read post]
