Search for: "Economou v. Little"
Results 701 - 720
of 4,670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:46 pm
In Intel v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 2:35 pm
Valeska V. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am
The Lord Chief Justice drew attention to Lord Diplock’s comments in Wright v British Railways Board [1983] 2 AC 773 that the Court of Appeal is “generally speaking the tribunal best qualified to set guidelines for judges trying such actions” particularly given the “inescapably artificial and conventional nature of the assessment of damages for non-economic loss”. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:24 am
Notably, the electronic versions of some books, such as academic and technical works, receive little or no discount when offered in electronic format in addition to print format. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
But first a little background. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 12:20 pm
International Inst. of Management v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 1:56 am
KG v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:47 am
The first is that there is no real economic growth. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 1:00 am
V. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
R.R.B. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
R.R.B. v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 2:45 pm
Hoddeson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
Since when was economic protectionism a legitimate business interest that warranted the court's indulgence? [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Iqbal v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
Pieces of the Amount A Puzzle Profit Margin Z Deemed Routine Profits X Deemed Non-Routine Profits Y=Z-X and Y=W+V Deemed Non-Routine Profits Attributable to Markets W Deemed Non-Routine Profits Attributable to Other Factors V To achieve tax certainty and minimize negative economic consequences, it will be important for businesses to have clearly defined metrics that determine the “sustained and significant involvement” for a market jurisdiction to… [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 9:20 am
An exception is Waits v Frito Lay, 978 F. 2d 1093 (9thCir. 1992). [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 6:14 pm
However in their everyday workings Patent Offices and courts pay little attention to the economic effect of their policies and decisions. [read post]
