Search for: "English v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 6,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am
Lyle reported on the argument for this blog, while I added a Plain English recap. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:35 am
State ,and State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
ARTICLE V(1) Where either contracting State imposes the tax by reason of the nationality thereof or the domicile therein of a decedent or a donor or a beneficiary of a decedent's estate or of a gift, such State shallallow against its tax (computed without application of this Article) a credit for the tax imposed by the other contracting State with respect to property situated at the time of the transfer in such other State and included for the taxes… [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:36 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 4:38 am
The Indiana Supreme Court's decision yesterday in the case of Jesus Arrieta v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 16 provides that the requested State shall represent the requesting State in any proceedings in the requested State arising out of a request for extradition. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
" The applicant stated that KECHRIBARI translates to English as "amber. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 7:57 am
In the Maryland case of Wolff v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am
The UK Supreme Court’s landmark decisions in Vedanta v Lungowe [2019] UKSC 20 and Okpabi v Shell [2021] UKSC 3 have granted jurisdiction and allowed such claims to proceed on the merits in English courts. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 2:10 am
It also provides helpful confirmation of the English law approach to identifying the governing law of an arbitration agreement, following an earlier landmark decision by the Supreme Court on the same issue in Enka v Chubb [2020] UKSC 38. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:41 am
There was no rule of construction and no rule of law which stated that a reinsurer must respond to every valid claim under the insurance irrespective of the terms of the reinsurance.The most important aspect to the decision was the way in which the Lords distinguished the present case from the decision of the House of Lords in Vesta v Butcher [1989] AC 852. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 9:27 am
Scope and Myths of Roe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:54 am
In re Thomas, 79 U.S.P.Q.2d 1021, 1024 (TTAB 2006) (citing Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 11:57 am
See State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:41 am
This portion of the claim was therefore struck out also.This appears to be the first time that an English court has dealt with this question, though it reaches the same result as the Irish decision in Mulvaney v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
M/V Vinson (D. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
But as the recent decision of the English High Court in Chantiers de l’Atlantique S.A. v. [read post]
