Search for: "Erwin Chemerinsky"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,614
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at “the success of attorneys throughout the Term,” while in the ABA Journal Erwin Chemerinsky contends that it “is hard to remember a Supreme Court term where the decisions did less to change the law. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 8:08 pm
"The conservative era of the Supreme Court is over": Law professor Erwin Chemerinsky has this essay online at The Los Angeles Times. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 3:11 am
Erwin Chemerinsky. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:39 am
Speakers will include Erwin Chemerinsky, Frederick Lawrence, and Dahlia Lithwick; Deborah Lauter will serve as moderator. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 3:22 am
” And in the ABA Journal, Erwin Chemerinsky cites the Court’s decisions in Zubik v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:33 am
Lain's article is part of a symposium on Erwin Chemerinsky's The Case Against the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 3:30 am
Wasserman In The Case Against the Supreme Court, Erwin Chemerinsky explains why he is disappointed in the Supreme Court and its failure to function as it is designed—as a countermajoritarian check on society’s worst majoritarian impulses, protecting individual rights from popular encroachment and offering a venue to minorities shut out of success in the political process. [read post]
25 May 2016, 10:59 am
Panelists will be Erwin Chemerinsky, Howard Bashman of How Appealing, Dahlia Lithwick, Robert Barnes, Kaaryn Gustafson, and Rick Hasen. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:59 am
Constitutional law scholar Erwin Chemerinsky says yes, but international law savant Eric Posner says no. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:12 am
Following Sunstein are Erwin Chemerinsky (UC Irvine), Richard Epstein (NYU, Chicago), Eric Posner (Chicago), Mark Lemley (Stanford), William Eskridge Jr. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am
Briefly: In the ABA Journal, Erwin Chemerinsky looks back at the Court’s recent decisions in two voting rights cases and suggests that there is “the sense that neither of these cases required Supreme Court attention, especially in an era of a very reduced court docket. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 pm
The following law professors were elected to the Academy this year: Bernard Black (Northwestern), Erwin Chemerinsky (UC Irvine), Liz Magill (Dean, Stanford), Trevor Morrison (Dean,... [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:05 pm
[Howard Gillman and Erwin Chemerinsky, L.A. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:15 pm
" And online at USA Today, law professor Erwin Chemerinsky has an essay titled "Texas immigration case should be an easy call. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:20 am
” Excellent papers taking a variety of approaches were presented by Erwin Chemerinsky (University of California, Irvine School of Law), Richard Epstein (NYU School of Law), Bob Farrell (Quinnipiac University School of Law), Tara Leigh Grove (William & Mary Law School), Jeffrey Jackson (Washburn University School of Law), Clark Neily (The Institute for Justice), John McGinnis (Northwestern University School of Law) and Suzanna Sherry… [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
By Erwin Chemerinsky’s measure in The Case Against the Supreme Court, all three are Supreme Court failures — cases in which the Court should have protected vulnerable minorities, but failed to do so. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:30 am
UC Irvine Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky argues that the Senate has a duty to vote on Supreme Court nominations because the Appointment Clause states that the president “shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States” (emphasis added), and the word “shall” implies a mandatory duty. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 5:09 am
Commentary on the Senate’s constitutional responsibility regarding hearings more generally comes from Erwin Chemerinsky and Michael Ramsey in a podcast for the National Constitution Center. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” Commentary on Garland’s nomination and the effect that Garland would have on the Court if he were confirmed comes from Howard Wasserman, who at PrawfsBlawg agrees with Geoffrey Stone that Garland would “move the Court left, but not back to the days of a bloc of six reliably liberal Justices”; Erwin Chemerinsky, who in The Atlantic imagines what it might “mean to have five justices on the Supreme Court who were appointed by Democratic… [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 11:50 am
" Law professor Erwin Chemerinsky has this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
