Search for: "FREDERICK v. STATE" Results 701 - 720 of 993
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 11:55 am by lpcprof
Reader Frederick Brodie notes that the Arizona State Bar wants to rid itself of Charna Johnson, the lawyer who says she "channeled" her client's dead wife while representing another client. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:31 am
Policy-maker's terminated after spouse sues State alleges violation of a Constitutional right to associate with others in intimate relationshipsAdler v Pataki, 2nd Circ., 185 F.3d 35Although the Second Circuit U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Loosely related state law claims sufficient for supplemental jurisdiction: Von Holdt v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:17 am by Bob Kraft
" The National Law Journal (10/13, Mauro) reports that David Frederick, a partner at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, is representing the family of Hannah Bruesewitz in the case, Bruesewitz v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:14 am by Bob Kraft
” The National Law Journal (10/13, Mauro) reports that David Frederick, a partner at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, is representing the family of Hannah Bruesewitz in the case, Bruesewitz v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:56 am by Will
In a moment of levity, after Frederick cited Justice Breyer’s opinion in Schafer v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
United States, a sentencing case that was argued on Monday. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:00 pm by constitutional lawblogger
This first Monday in October, the start of a new term of the United States Supreme Court, reminds us of all the other cases the Court has decided, including the many which have achieved iconic status. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm by Mark Bennett
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 11:43 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) From the introduction of last week’s decision in Henry v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:15 pm
Frederick Sharer.Held: This Court affirmed the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment in favor of the Seller of a truck dealership on the basis that no fraud had been committed by the Seller and that an integration clause found in an agreement barred the Buyer from asserting claims of fraud (including fraud in the inducement), concealment, and negligent misrepresentation.Facts:The Seller initially sued the Buyer for breach of a written contract by failing to pay… [read post]