Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States" Results 701 - 720 of 1,547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
Morever, under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution, “the judicial proceedings of a state court shall have the same full faith and credit within every court in the United States as they have by law or usage in the courts of the issuing state. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
Morever, under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution, “the judicial proceedings of a state court shall have the same full faith and credit within every court in the United States as they have by law or usage in the courts of the issuing state. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of America’s Health Insurance Plans Amicus brief of Landmark Legal Foundation Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of Family Research Council   Harvey v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Harris 14-407Issue: Whether, if a state appellate court rejects an unpreserved federal claim after assessing whether the “plain error” exception to state preservation requirements permitted review, but does not explain its reasoning, a federal habeas court should conclude that the state court ruled on the federal claim’s merits, such that federal court review is appropriate. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:47 am
Royal Maccabees Life Insurance Co., 174 F.3d 1207 (11th Cir. 1999)....A few years after Butero was decided, the Supreme Court [decided Aetna Health Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
Co., the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin initially granted summary judgment to Standard Insurance Company, meaning they decided to favor the insurance company without a full trial. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:36 am by Bill Heinze
See, First Niagara Insurance Brokers Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.Contempt -- Where court had entered order requiring co-owner of condominium apartment to “vacate” the unit because her occupancy violated the fifty-five and older age restriction for residents, it was error to hold the co-owner in contempt for continuing to spend several hours a day at the unit for the purpose of remodeling and gardening and staying overnight on several occasions -- Court order was… [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 2:49 am by NCC Staff
But years later, Marshall made his thoughts clear about the treaty clause in an 1823 decision called American Insurance Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 7:27 am by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
Health care in the United States is governed by well-known federal statutes such as the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Supreme Court of the United States recently stayed injunctions against implementing the rule. [read post]