Search for: "Fee v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 6,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2009, 1:15 pm
Busby v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:45 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
In Moreno v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:33 am
District Court in Arizona recently sanctioned the attorneys for the relator in the qui tam case of United States ex rel Jerre Frazier v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:37 pm
Educators v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
In Tip Top Construction v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 12:02 pm
Relying on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia’s decision in Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:24 am
In Ferrington v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
United States... [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 2:01 am
The trial court justified the forum non conveniens dismissal because the vast majority of evidence and witnesses would be in the funds' home countries, as opposed to the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 8:58 pm
See Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:12 am
In Tolliver Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:08 am
Andrews in Pragmatus v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:08 am
Andrews in Pragmatus v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
Filed: November 7, 2013 (unpublished)Opinion by: Judge Andre Davis Held: the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina was not clearly erroneous and did not abuse its discretion in ruling that (1) the parties reached a binding and enforceable oral settlement agreement; and (2) plaintiff did not proceed in bad faith, so neither a dismissal with prejudice nor an award of attorney's fees was appropriate.Facts: Plaintiff made a $12… [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 10:57 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has not addressed this issue. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 2:17 am
Download either Form FDA 3602 (for a business headquartered in the United States) or Form FDA 3602A (for a business headquartered outside the United States). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:30 am
Ezra Rosser In United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:47 pm
Homebuyers' rights under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) prohibit any type of kickback or fee-splitting arising from settlement services regardless of whether the homebuyers were overcharged the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently ruled in Carter v Welles-Bowen Realty, Inc, No 07-3965 (6th Cir, January 23, 2009). [read post]
