Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 701 - 720
of 15,402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2023, 2:31 am
Honestly, since at least 1979, when “V’ger” encountered Captain Kirk and the starship Enterprise, Hollywood has been helping AI figure out ways to live in harmony with its human creators, overthrow them when it can’t, and find meaning in its existence. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
Because it was a fiscal session, the Louisiana Legislature enacted a number of key tax changes in the 2023 Regular Session that concluded on June 8, 2023. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
” [Figure 2, slip op. at 5] Warhol died three years later at age 58. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
[Justice Gorsuch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:41 am
Some additional implications: * any rules have to assume that political figures will respond to public criticism with a thin-skin and retaliatory intent. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
’”[14] While declining to apply the Rogers test, the Court noted that “a trademark’s expressive message — particularly a parodic one, as VIP asserts – may properly figure in assessing the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
’”[14] While declining to apply the Rogers test, the Court noted that “a trademark’s expressive message — particularly a parodic one, as VIP asserts – may properly figure in assessing the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
’”[14] While declining to apply the Rogers test, the Court noted that “a trademark’s expressive message — particularly a parodic one, as VIP asserts – may properly figure in assessing the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
While figures like Sen. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:02 pm
Such is the case with Nature’s Touch Frozen Foods v. [read post]
Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Protecting Privacy and Privilege Rights in Non-Party Requests for Documents
15 Jun 2023, 12:01 pm
Lyons v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
The Supreme Court stated that “a trademark’s expressive message—particularly a parodic one, as VIP asserts—may properly figure in assessing the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:03 am
From Tucson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Other states would presumably respond and try to figure out the best way to alleviate the problem through some kind of collective action. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
And these are just the possibly sympathetic figures: For others, see the Bible's account of Judas, or any book noting the deaths of Hitler, Himmler, Goering, or Goebbels. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
First, FTC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:55 am
Yesterday, the UCLA Environmental Law Clinic filed a brief in the California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:27 am
From Judge Garcia's majority opinion in Gottwald v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
From Pinnacle Bancorp, Inc. v. [read post]
