Search for: "Fish v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
United States Fish & Wildlife Serv., 378 F.3d 1059, 1075 (9th Cir.2004) (stating "The BiOps considered the important local effects, analyzing critical habitat more broadly when individual effects were not important")... [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:22 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:07 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 3:51 pm
United States, which involved the Crow Tribe’s efforts to regulate non-Indian hunting and fishing on non-Indian-owned land within the tribe’s reservation. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 12:37 pm
United States in 2015 (holding that a fish is not a “tangible object” under the federal obstruction of justice statute) and Bond v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
There are many ways that a non-citizen can enter the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am
Joe Palazzolo of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog reports that Antoine Jones, the respondent in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:03 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”) listed the delta smelt as a threatened species in 1993 under the Endangered Species Act... [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:52 am
Jackson (Indian Reservation Diminishment)United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:19 pm
Since 1986, the species has been classified as threatened in the eastern United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:00 am
United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:25 am
Judge Kleinfeld holds (indeed, waxes poetic about the fact) that the federal courts shouldn't resolve a continuing and longstanding dispute between various Indian tribes about how much fish each tribe is allowed to take under a series of treaties with the United States in the 1850s. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
United States, in which the Court invalidated the conviction of a commercial fisherman for destroying undersized fish, comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, while commentary comes from Jonathan Keim at the National Review Online’s Bench Memos. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
In the absence of United States Ninth Circuit or Supreme Court guidance on the question, the court relied on unpublished decisions from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:29 pm
ShareOn Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:32 am
” Given that vast land areas of the United States are part of the migratory bird flyways, the court’s opinion paves the way for all of these areas to become critical habitat for listed species. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
