Search for: "Friday v. Friday" Results 701 - 720 of 13,166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2012, 9:27 am
Earlier this week, when writing up his little note on Woolley and Timesource v Ultimate Products Ltd and Henley's Clothing Ltd [2012] EWHC 339 (Ch) ("The Ultimate watchmakers case: passing off leads to a ticking off" here, this Kat chanced to comment on the fact that the case in question was not yet available on the BAILII website. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:56 am
The three events are * IPR in China (22 and 23 November 2010) * International Patent Litigation (6 and 7 December 2010) * International Copyright Law (7 and 8 December 2010) The UK's Intellectual Property Office is trawling for your views on another reference that has been made to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling: Case C-360/10 Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM) v N.V. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:05 am
The US Supreme Court has exercised a major influence on all areas of IP in recent times (the Napster, Grokster, Victoria's Secret and eBay v MercExchange rulings, to name but a few). [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:19 am
By chance today I read an interesting article in the current edition of the Society for Computers & Law journal on Bilski v Kappos by Dr Robert Harrison and Jordan S Hatcher, in which they suggest that companies build defensive IP portfolios to use when faced with a challenge of patent infringement from a competitor -- to cross-license or cross-sue. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:30 am
The IPKat recalls a Finnish Supreme Court majority decision, Teosto v A Taxi Driver [2004] ECDR 3, in which the playing of music by a taxi driver in the course of taking a customer to his destination constituted a performance in public, even though the passenger generally had no say in the choice of music - or whether the taxi driver might be kind enough to turn it off: might the same approach be adopted here, he wonders? [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:11 am
 Britax Childcare Pty Ltd v Infa-Secure Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 467. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 9:06 am by Simon Fodden
This entry is merely to provide a link to the decision: Black v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Google’ — Last Friday, the Supreme Court granted cert in Oracle v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:24 pm
Last Friday, we looked at AFCCA's fascinating opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm by jesse londin
;)Now, in typically random fashion, the Flybys (and on an actual Friday, yet ... what is getting into this blog?) [read post]
22 May 2021, 7:12 am by Florian Mueller
No, I don't want to gloat, but it's mind-boggling what happened yesterday in that Oakland courtroom at the end of the main part (they're done apart from closing arguments on Monday) of the Epic Games v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:08 am by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
On Friday I suggested that the Supreme Court could well decide to hear a judicial speech case, Bauer v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
He might do some defriending, though, we suspect.Jeffrey V. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm by Curt Cutting
Blount, the Supreme Court will consider that petition at its conference this Friday, Oct. 29. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
The 5th District's decision last week in State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 12:45 pm
The blog is already well covered in terms of South African input, but candidates from other African countries (or from outside Africa but who have inside information) should email Darren here and introduce themselves and tell him what they can do to help with the blog.It's not yet available on BAILII, but Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure (a trading name) and others has just got a little more complex. [read post]