Search for: "General Corporation v. General Motors Corporation" Results 701 - 720 of 790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2025, 5:38 am by Chris Castle
Bullmoose” toparody former General Motors’ president Charles Wilson who told the Senate Armed Services Committee that “What is good for the country is good for General Motors. [read post]
  In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
"The Freed decision was followed in a May 28, 2010 memorandum and order in Earls v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am by Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D.
He discusses the inconsistencies between AGC Solomon’s findings and those of an administrative law judge regarding the legality of General Motors’ social media policy. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by William B. Gould IV
The inability of the United Auto Workers to reverse three plant closings instituted by General Motors dramatizes this protection vacuum all the more. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:24 pm
El artículo 1.1 LRCSCVM (Real Decreto Legislativo 8/2004, de 29 de octubre, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley sobre responsabilidad civil y seguro en la circulación de vehículos a motor) establece que “el conductor de vehículos a motor es responsable, en virtud del riesgo creado por la conducción de estos, de los daños causados a las personas o en los bienes con motivo de la circulación. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:36 pm
  To "operate" and what constitutes a "principal operator" are defined in Part 1 of the  Revised Regulation (1984) Under the Insurance (Motor Vehicle) Act, B.C. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Necessarily the cases considered are but a selection but one that, in my view, is sufficiently broad to enable some general conclusions about the performance of the Court to date. [read post]