Search for: "Glass v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2018, 4:06 pm
The ECtHR found violations under Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) and 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) ECHR (right to fair trial), in relation to the conditions of their transportation and detention in the courthouse, their pre-trial detention, the treatment during the court hearings (being exposed to public view in a glass dock surrounded by armed police), and restrictions to legal assistance. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
[UPDATE: Reader CW notes that Minnesota seems to have accepted § 772(a) as well, see Glass Service Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
[UPDATE: Reader CW notes that Minnesota seems to have accepted ยง 772(a) as well, see Glass Service Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:09 am
In Stanifer v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:23 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority in Sandifer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 12:05 pm
Les bon temps rouler, indeed.The case of Scianneaux v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
It is simple enough to require that the breach be remedied "if it is capable of remedy" - an approach endorsed in Glass v Kencakes [1966] 1 QB 611. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
It is simple enough to require that the breach be remedied "if it is capable of remedy" - an approach endorsed in Glass v Kencakes [1966] 1 QB 611. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
And, again, Ramirez wasn't doing anything illegal; he just wanted to take a nap.So Ramirez opens his eyes, looks at the police officer, opens either the window or door slightly, and asks the police officer -- without the deference typically given to those in authority -- if it was really necessary for the officer to wake him up; e.g., "Is it standard procedure to go around banging on glass windows of persons that are sitting or sleeping in their cars? [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:34 am
Hanrahan v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:13 pm
Heuston, ‘Donoghue v Stevenson in retrospect' (1957) 20 MLR 1. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 11:22 am
A dentist who is very fond of the Marx Brothers puts a Groucho wig, mustache, nose and glasses on all anesthetized patients, sticks a cigar in their mouths and photographs them for his private collection. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:09 am
Such was the case in Sundin v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:31 pm
Three of the cases are from the Court of Criminal Appeals.State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:15 am
After failed attemtps by Apple CEO Tim Cook to avoid trial though mediation with Samsung this Summer, opening arguments in the Apple v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:10 am
Glass house and stones, etc. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 11:05 am
We state this because the New Jersey Appellate Division in Wild v. [read post]