Search for: "Golden v. Golden" Results 701 - 720 of 2,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2009, 1:29 pm
(I smiled when Judge Clifton explained in footnote 2 of the opinion: "Marin is the county immediately north of San Francisco, across the Golden Gate Bridge. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:26 am
Martinez applied to the college two days later on July 7, 2004 for spousal health care benefits for Golden. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:38 am
  This means that, where a customer purchases a broadly used word as a keyword, that customer can focus search responses by blocking out search results that contain unwanted terms [this Kat wonders if computer and media giant Apple has negatively matched search results for "Apple" so as to exclude "Golden Delicious", "Russet", "Worcester Pearman" and other apples of his choice]. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:55 am by Ben
Judge Kevin Aalto identified five factors to be looked at:- the plaintiff must have a bona fide case- another party must have information pertinent to the case (eg personal details of subscribers)- a court order is the only reasonable way of obtaining this information- that fairness requires the information to be provided before thr trial- any order will not cause undue delay, inconvenience or expense to the third party or othersThere is also a comprehensive review of Canadian case law;… [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:49 pm by Greensboro Legal Blog
He served as Editor-in-Chief of the Law Review and was elected to the Order of the Coif and Order of the Golden Fleece, the highest honorary societies at the University. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Here are links to important resources and commentary on the state of indigent defense at Gideon's golden anniversary: ACLU: "Too Many Still Wait to Hear Gideon's Trumpet" Stephen Bright and Sia Sanneh: "'Gideon v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 9:24 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaThe California Supreme Court this week refused to hear the appeal of Village Voice Media Holdings-owned SF Weekly's adverse ruling in the antitrust suit brought by rival weekly Bay Guardian, according to an article in the San Francisco Chronicle (www.sfgate.com).With only one of the seven-member high court willing to hear the appeal in Bay Guardian v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:20 am by Brad Pauley
As we’ve previously mentioned, the Supreme Court has set oral argument in Perry v. [read post]