Search for: "Golden v. State" Results 701 - 720 of 1,893
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Broad “no re-hire” provisions in settlement agreements may, under certain circumstances, constitute unlawful restraints of trade under California law, as reflected in Golden v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Mandalia v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 May 2015. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am by Howard Knopf
We have seen only a few outside studies on copyright law and/or economics by well qualified experts since the long hiatus after the golden age of the 1980’. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
  After all, the plaintiffs were almost all litigation tourists with no connection whatsoever to the Golden State. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
No one yet knows how SCOTUS will rule in King v Burntwell, but that hasn't stopped the doomsayers from claiming that a gazillion people will "lose their subsidies" should Plaintiff (King) prevail.No, they won't.That's because you can't lose something to which you were never entitled.The fact of the matter is, should SCOTUS insist that the law be applied as it was written, then folks in states using the 404Care.gov site were never eligible to receive… [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
In Vino Veritas Golden Gate Mock Trial Competition // Golden Gate Law School (October 23-26, 2014) Coach: Prof. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:19 am
The General Court affirmed that the ORO marks could not be said to be scarcely distinctive, and Case T-344/03 Saiwa v OHIM-Barilla Alimentare (SELEZIONE ORO BARILLA could not be said to have established a precedent. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 2: Audiovisual works – educational uses – primary and secondary schools (K-12)This proposed class would allow kindergarten through twelfth-grade educators and students to circumvent access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures and other audiovisual works for educational purposes. [read post]
13 May 2015, 12:05 pm
I mentioned when the original opinion came out last month that I thought that Justice Perren's opinion was particularly enthusiastic. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:30 am
  The case is called Williams v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:39 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
He says: “The golden generation of home ownership – an exception not the rule. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:12 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]