Search for: "Grant v. Commonwealth"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
Zogenix, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 4:15 pm
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, (2002), in which he held that a Native American holy man's free exercise rights were violated when Pennsylvania refused to grant him an exemption from a permit fee requirement for two black bears he kept. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
There, the commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Philadelphia district attorney challenged the grant of habeas relief to a woman convicted of murdering her disabled stepson. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:08 am
Commonwealth Land Title Ins. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:01 am
From Prashad v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 1:44 pm
Back in 2010, in the case of Jordan v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:32 am
Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Com. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Issue: Whether the dormant commerce clause and dormant foreign commerce clause apply to Puerto Rico. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 8:28 am
In Charles Northrup v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 8:28 am
In Charles Northrup v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:36 am
When the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania recently decided Lee v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 7:11 am
In Smith v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:03 am
This concept was again tested by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in Leca v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 2:42 am
In the matter of Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 2:13 pm
Gorsline v Board of Supervisors of Fairfield Township, 186 A.3d 375 (PA 6/1/2018) [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 9:32 am
The district court here compared the restrictions in this matter with those followed in Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 11:03 am
Aldoupolis, 390 Mass. 438, 439 (1983) (empaneling a criminal jury); Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Opinion below (3rd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
" In Gentex Corp. v. [read post]