Search for: "HUGHES v. STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2016, 4:25 pm
As we suggested in our preview of Tuesday’s oral argument in Ross v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Jane Doe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
The requirement of authentication is thus a condition precedent to admitting evidence” (United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:22 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm
Justice Potter Stewart first broached this possibility in 1967 in his concurring opinion in Hughes v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
In the first case, which we would like to call the "Bad case," but which the official reporter calls Hughes v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
The Hughes Court certainly seemed to head toward a general rule that states must make reasonable efforts to appoint (and thereby pay) counsel for the indigent.Yet, in Avery v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:51 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 9:26 pm
The Supreme Court recently observed this challenge to patent claim interpretation, stating in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm
Purcell, New York Law School, looks back to Charles Evans Hughes's Supreme Court of the United States for inspiration on how Chief Justices can induce the resignations of Associate Justices (The Hill).Barbara Lauriat, Texas Tech University School of Law, has published Robinson & Roberts v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 am
GuestKat Rose Hughes explained the implications of the UK's incorporation of the SPC Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 469/2009) into domestic law for UK SPC holders, with elements of both continuity and potentially critical change. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
The overlooked majority: the limits of Whitney v CIRRichard Thomas (First Tier Tribunal, UK)7. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 11:04 am
Contrast Effie Film, LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 3:09 pm
") And in Barfield v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
Oct. 1, 2013).New Jersey: Hughes v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 8:25 pm
Ct. 257, 260 (1929); Hughes v. [read post]
