Search for: "Hall v. State" Results 701 - 720 of 4,195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2020, 9:08 am
Contents include:Carolina Moehlecke, The Chilling Effect of International Investment Disputes: Limited Challenges to State Sovereignty Anastassia V Obydenkova & Vinícius G Rodrigues Vieira, The Limits of Collective Financial Statecraft: Regional Development Banks and Voting Alignment with the United States at the United Nations General Assembly Lauge N Skovgaard Poulsen, Beyond Credible Commitments: (Investment) Treaties as Focal Points Celeste Beesley,… [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am by Preston Lim
As they pointed out, just a few years earlier, in Kazemi Estate v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The Democratic machine in Tammany Hall also traded Cleveland votes in exchange for Republican support of its local and state candidates.[5]  As a result, Harrison won New York’s electoral votes and, by implication, the presidency.Many Republicans justified the election fraud in the North as an appropriate response to the disenfranchisement of African-Americans in the South, which was widespread and pervasive at the time. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Following other unsuccessful attempts, such as in Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 2:53 pm by mtlawlibrary
Hall DA 19-0159 2020 MT 46 Civil – Real Property Speer v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm by Giles Peaker
In Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hall [2001] EWCA Civ 2034, and in B Osborn & Co Ltd v Dior [2003] EWCA Civ 281, both concerning the validity of notices under section 20 Housing Act 1988, it was held that the same approach applied to statutory notices, and also  “they also establish that notices which contain errors or omissions that are not obvious may be “substantially to the same effect” as a prescribed form if the notices nevertheless fulfil the… [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm by Giles Peaker
In Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hall [2001] EWCA Civ 2034, and in B Osborn & Co Ltd v Dior [2003] EWCA Civ 281, both concerning the validity of notices under section 20 Housing Act 1988, it was held that the same approach applied to statutory notices, and also  “they also establish that notices which contain errors or omissions that are not obvious may be “substantially to the same effect” as a prescribed form if the notices nevertheless fulfil the… [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  Indeed, Article 21(1) of the GDPR specifically states that the successful exercise of the right to objection must result in the controller “no longer process[ing] the personal data”. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 3:36 pm by Josh Blackman
Hall & Mark David Hall eds., Indianapolis, Liberty Fund 2007); see also Stinneford, supra, at 1769. [read post]