Search for: "Herring v. Campbell" Results 701 - 720 of 1,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Respondents alternatively argue that petitioner has failed to state a claim for relief insofar as the superintendent acted within her authority to transfer petitioner and her justification for doing so was reasonable. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
"The amici cited Judge Leval's citation in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, stating that"the goals of the copyright law...are not always best served by automatically granting injunctive relief when parodists [and presumably commentators] are found to have gone beyond the bounds of fair use. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
However, the House of Lords has made it clear that there is no tort of invasion of privacy ( see Wainwright v Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406, Campbell v MGN [2004] 2AC 457, and the Court of Appeal in McKennitt v Ash) . [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Scotland In the case of Campbell v Dugdale [2019] ScotSC 32 the Sheriff’s Court dismissed a libel action against MSP Kezia Dugdale over an allegation that blogger Stuart Campbell had posted “homophobic tweets”. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 8 June 2016, Stephens J gave a judgment in Board of Governors of Campbell College v Independent News and Media ([2016] NIQB 51). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:51 am
’ This is an important issue, as the Supreme Court held, in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (1994, here), that “the more transformative the new work, the less will be significance of other factors, like commercialism, that may weigh against a finding of fair use. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 3:44 am by INFORRM
Lord Hope of Craighead provided such a definition in Campbell v MGN. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright History Shyam Balganesh University of Pennsylvania Law School The Questionable Origins of the Copyright Infringement Analysis  Jerome Frank’s infamous/canonical © infringement test from Arnstein v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Notes that the Supreme Court provided the entire lyrics of both songs involved in Campbell v. [read post]