Search for: "Hill v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Samuel Green weighs in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:09 am
United States, Korematsu v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:54 am
Just two days ago, Charles Kurzman, sociology professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and David Schanzer, director of the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security at Duke University, wrote this in a New York Times op ed: The main terrorist threat in the United States is not from violent Muslim extremists, but from right-wing extremists. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:19 am
The case ruling was issued May 10, 2012, by the Houston Division, Southern District of Texas, United States District Court. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:10 pm
The charges include conspiracy to defraud the United States, wire fraud and bank fraud, and aggravated identity theft. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 5:22 pm
In Utah v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 2:42 pm
”United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
In addition to working for much lower pay, they also do not receive any benefits and must provide their own hard hats, rigging equipment, and steel-toed boots, which the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires all employees to wear when working as stagehands. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 11:00 pm
In the case of Sanchez v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 5:55 pm
And in Spansion v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:34 pm
EPCON Homestead, LLC v Town of Chapel Hill, 2021 WL 2138630 (MD NC 5/26/2021) [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:33 am
Thus, plaintiff failed to show, as required to state a cause of action for legal malpractice, that but for defendants’ conduct he would have prevailed in the underlying action (see Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]). [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 11:09 am
This residence in question is located in the Capitol Hill neighborhood of Washington, DC. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:03 am
United States means for the future of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
At issue are these three certified questions of state law from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division: What is the statute of limitations for claims of negligent misidentification? [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The residential parcel is known as “Lot 9” in the 9-unit residential subdivision known as Hidden Hills. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:30 am
In the June 8, 2015 ruling in Hill v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
