Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 63,262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2022, 12:45 pm
Harper for presidential elections (if, a big if, any independent state legislature holding in the congressional election context extends to presidential elections, too). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:40 am
Jackson, 10-735, definitely looks like a hold at this point, probably for Wal-Mart v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 6:36 am
Runyon, 232 F.3d 33 (2d Cir. 2000), obsolete.A few weeks ago, the Second Circuit took up this issue, holding in Christianson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 2:53 am
Bauman, 2014) setting limits to state court jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
Here is the opinion in Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:00 am
In Bond v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:39 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:00 am
In Parallel Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:15 pm
In the March 16, 2012 opinion in Matthew G. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:30 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:30 am
Super at 279; State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 8:18 am
Ilya's reading of New York v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 pm
The decision handed down last week by the United States Supreme Court in United States v Stevens shows the radically different approach taken in the United States in relation questions of “extreme” and “offensive” freedom of expression. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:02 am
The State appealed.The court of appeals reversed in an unpublished opinion holding that Blackshere had failed to show that the missing evidence was exculpatory. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:13 am
So holds the Ninth Circuit.That distinction is definitely tough to defend. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 6:36 am
Here is the opinion in Clay v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 5:53 pm
Justice Alito delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in FBI v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:50 pm
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 , holding that requiring nonmembers of public-sector unions to pay fees to cover collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment. [read post]
