Search for: "Holland, Appeal of" Results 701 - 720 of 1,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  The court backpedaled from that a bit last year in Holland v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
Edelman and Werner Ilsen, New York City, of counsel.Burlingham, Hupper & Kennedy, New York City, for defendant Holland-America Line; Harold M. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:24 am
State, 2008 WL 2191159 (Arkansas Court of Appeals, 2008). [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
After a meeting in Berlin with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, French President Francois Hollande and German Prime Minister Angela Merkel called for peace talks with the Kremlin over the continuing crisis in Ukraine. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:19 am
DeStefano have initiated proceedings in federal district court to be promoted after winning their Supreme Court appeal in June. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:51 am by Steve Hall
Three more death row inmates could run out of appeals this year, and the next execution could be as soon as July. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The appeals panel found that plaintiffs properly pled a cause of action for negligence and willful and wanton misconduct under both Arizona and Texas law and loss of child consortium under Arizona law and thus the case was remanded back for further proceedings consistent with that opinion. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Lee, Elizabeth Holland, and Patrice P. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The appeals panel found that plaintiffs properly pled a cause of action for negligence and willful and wanton misconduct under both Arizona and Texas law and loss of child consortium under Arizona law and thus the case was remanded back for further proceedings consistent with that opinion. [read post]