Search for: "Hood v State"
Results 701 - 720
of 811
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2008, 5:27 pm
Hood, 541 U.S. 440 (2004). [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:21 am
USAA case in Mississippi state court. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
This is the testimony where Lackey said he didn't go to AG Jim Hood with concerns over Balducci's earwigging overtures because he heard from Stallings that Scruggs, through Moore, had pressured Hood to drop his criminal investigation of State Farm because the insurer was demanding it as a condition of settling 640 cases, the settlement of which resulted in beaucoup coin to the Scruggs Katrina Group… [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:32 am
If you remember, Lackey said he didn't go to AG Jim Hood with his qualms about the overtures by Tim Balducci because of what he heard about Scruggs putting heat on Hood, with Moore's involvement, so that Hood would help settle cases against State Farm. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
Like the testimony by Judge Lackey yesterday about not being able to go to the Mississippi Attorney General's Office because, he was told, Jim Hood had buckled to pressure from Dickie Scruggs to cooperate in Scruggs' mass Katrina settlement with State Farm that netted the $26.5 million in fees at the core of the Jones v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 11:47 pm
Integra (Scripps v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:06 am
**From: Hunter, Jeffrey [[mailto:jhunter@naag.org]]Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 9:22 AMTo:Cc: mlanf@ago.state.ms.usSubject: Request from Mississippi re: States' Suit v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 9:14 am
State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 9:03 am
We affirm without hesitation, and hold that Judge Hood acted well within the discretion given to him by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(C). 08a0153n.062008/03/18 Mynatt v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 8:23 am
This last item, of course, led indirectly to two prosecutions of Scruggs -- the first stemming from his game of keepaway with the help of AG Jim Hood with the documents in defiance of Judge Acker's order, the second as a result of the conspiracy to bribe Judge Lackey in the Jones v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:19 am
Because [Joey] Langston was awarded state contracts by Hood to sue prescription drug-maker Eli Lilly and MCI, Hood said he could not prosecute him. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment against the State. 08a0105p.06 Floyd v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
Look at Hood's press release from when the settlement with State Farm was announced in January 2007, the settlement where he agreed not to prosecute the insurer:"After months of heated negotiations, I am happy to announce that our office has reached a settlement agreement with State Farm in our state court litigation,” said Attorney General Jim Hood. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 6:54 am
Also, have you noticed that Hood has had very little to nothing to say about the confidential settlement in the State Farm v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 5:50 am
Another thing -- in the transcript of the State Farm v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:18 am
Scruggs undoubtedly was involved, in the Alabama case, in sending the Rigsby documents to Hood instead of returning them to the attorneys for the sisters' former employers as ordered. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:11 am
My read of the transcript of the February 6 State Farm v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 6:34 am
But remember at the February 6 hearing in State Farm v. [read post]
