Search for: "House v. House"
Results 701 - 720
of 41,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2020, 12:53 pm
Young v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:12 am
Magnohard Ltd v Cadogan and others [2012] EWCA Civ 594 is yet another case dealing with whether a property can be a “house reasonably so called” and, hence, capable of being enfranchised under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:12 am
Magnohard Ltd v Cadogan and others [2012] EWCA Civ 594 is yet another case dealing with whether a property can be a “house reasonably so called” and, hence, capable of being enfranchised under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:40 am
Adnan Bchara V. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 5:20 am
In the R-1B district, the principal permitted uses are single family detached dwelling and houses of worship. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 10:32 pm
The court found that, notwithstanding the terms of the lease, the property was a house, following what was taken as the test in Tandon v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 11:47 am
SBMB Law also notes the famous New York case of Stamovsky v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 11:31 am
Huff v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
The first of the two cases—40 Main Street Offices, LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:11 am
He left the house to go directly to a drug deal. [read post]
17 May 2013, 12:43 am
New York Times DealBook: A Dickensian Delay at the IRS, by Victor Fleischer (Colorado; moving to San Diego): A plot device in Charles Dickens’s Bleak House follows the interminable case of Jarndyce v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 11:01 pm
I recently noted the decision of Telstra v Minister for Communications disallowing Telstra's claim of privilege for certain communications by its in-house lawyers because it could not be shown the lawyers were acting independent of management. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:20 am
The complaint (full text) in Walsh v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
In 2018 the Supreme Court decided an important case—Ortiz v. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 10:07 am
One of the minidramas developing in the newly minted Democratic House is who will chair the House Intelligence Committee. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:58 am
Last Friday, the Texas Supreme Court answered that question in Severance v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 1:19 pm
But yesterday's decision in Davis v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:07 pm
However, government officials have in recent years have voiced no significant support for this idea, and, furthermore, the Supreme Court made clear years ago in Lindsey v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:22 am
The next round of the battle between the State and those who build houses in breach of planning controls is scheduled to be heard in the case of Welwyn Hatfield Council v the Secretary of State in the Supreme Court on 7 February 2011. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
Bracknell Forest Borough Council v Green and another [2009] EWCA Civ 238; [2009] WLR(D) 106 “Where a local housing authority claimed possession of a dwelling house under ground 16 in Sch 2 to the Housing Act 1985 (under-occupation), the suitability of the alternative accommodation offered was relevant to the question whether it was reasonable to make [...] [read post]
