Search for: "Human v. State" Results 701 - 720 of 19,537
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
The recent findings of an international trial monitoring panel in the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 12:16 pm by MEL
Published in Canadian HR Reporter A new landmark decision from an Ontario Arbitrator, Public Health Sudbury & Districts v Ontario Nurses’ Association, found that Public Health Sudbury and Districts (“PHSD”) breached the Ontario Human Rights Code (“Code”) when it terminated an employee who refused to comply with the employer’s vaccination policy on the basis of a protected human rights ground, being the employee’s creed. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:00 am by Isabel McArdle
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) Read judgment As readers of this blog will know, control orders have often been successfully challenged in the courts on human rights grounds. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 4:22 am
Matter of Humane Socy. of United States v Fanslau, 2008 NY Slip Op 06681, Decided on August 28, 2008, Appellate Division, Third Department In Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, the Court of Appeals said... [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:16 pm by INFORRM
In the four months from 1 July to 31 October 2015, the Court of Human Rights handed down judgments in 11 cases where an Article 10 issue was central. [read post]
12 May 2022, 1:37 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
Many of you who read this blog will know that last week, there was a leaked Supreme Court draft opinion on Roe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
On 21 September 2009 the Third Section of the Court of Human Rights gave judgment in the libel case of Polanco Torres et Movilla Polanco v Spain. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:50 am by Michael DelSignore
  The Massachusetts Declaration of Human Rights and the United States Constitution protect citizens from unreasonable seizures. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm by Galen Sherwin, Women's Rights Project
But in the meanwhile, the United States has a duty to ensure that at a minimum, those responsible for human trafficking — including diplomats and sponsoring nations — are held accountable. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:07 am by CMS
In this post, Liz Jackson, Trainee Solicitor, and Max Wiktorsson, Associate, in the Employment Team at CMS preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:38 pm by Rumpole
 Confronted with the law, see, Makemson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” (Although, one Western District of Pennsylvania judge concluded that the Third Circuit’s decision in Bibby v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Workplace Prof
A few weeks ago, the New York Court of Appeals became the first State supreme court to expressly import Ricci v. [read post]