Search for: "Hurt v. United States" Results 701 - 720 of 1,718
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2016, 8:48 am by Mark Hartsoe
The Federal District Court’s Decision Following a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga denied the defendant’s motion. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am by Mark Hartsoe
The Federal District Court’s Decision Following a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga denied the defendant’s motion. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am by Mark Hartsoe
The Federal District Court’s Decision Following a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga denied the defendant’s motion. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  This hack led to a putative class action complaint being filed against OPM and others in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in late June, 2015.[6]   As in the customer cases discussed above, the gravamen of the employee complaint against OPM is inaction. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be…subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial ass [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:21 am by Florian Mueller
It's one of the Solicitor General's tasks to represent the United States in court. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:53 am by SHG
United States, the law at stake was the Armed Career Criminal Act, and let’s face it, who loves armed career criminals? [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 3:48 am by SHG
LEGAL STANDARDS The United States conducted this investigation and review of the University under its Title IX and Title IV authority. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
`The United States Supreme Court has recognized a tension between protection of reputation and protection of freedom of expression, which is the strongest when there is a media defendant, the subject matter is one of public interest or the plaintiff is a public official or a public figure. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
IN THE NEWS The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 6:19 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  It will apply, by its terms, to all devices and systems manufactured, sold, or used in the United States. [read post]