Search for: "IN RE MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY"
Results 701 - 720
of 976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
They argue that Section 523(a)(2)(A) in the 1978 Code merely re-enacted provisions from the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, as amended in 1903, 1926 and 1960. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:57 am
While it is true that the thieves have not yet returned our property it is also true that they did NOT achieve what they were after - to fine and/or imprison us, to forfeit the car to the government, and to make this dog-and-pony show look like justice is being done! [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm
You shall neglect no one’s interest nor seek to destroy any one’s property. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
Applying this interpretation of the statute to the facts of this case, it held that the mother's motion for an award of an additional attorney's fee was timely, as the appellate process had not yet concluded at the time the motion was made. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
Law firms, as well, are therefore encouraging clients to pursue contractual certainty given that the legal intellectual property issues related to generative AI software are in flux. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
California satisfies the requirement for a defendant to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require reappointment of counsel to file a motion for new trial. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:17 am
I’m not sure what you’re asking, responds the judge. [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:16 am
Return to earlier topic, about short portions: Example of when you’d want to use more than a short portion. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
Therefore, it denied [Thomas’] motion to suppress the pornographic images that were discovered on his computer.People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Falso, No. 062721 Conviction for crimes relating to child pornography and traveling with the intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct with minors is affirmed where: 1) though the district court's finding of probable cause was not supported by a substantial basis, the district court nevertheless properly denied defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence seized from his home under the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule; 2) the district court was not knowingly or… [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Beard, No. 07-3711 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit by prison inmates challenging the confiscation of legal materials by state corrections officials, dismissals of some claims and summary judgment for defendants on the remainder are affirmed where: 1) plaintiffs did not allege an actual injury in their claim of loss of access to the courts; 2) defendants demonstrated a legitimate governmental interest in stopping inmates from filing fraudulent liens and judgments against prosecutors and prison… [read post]
19 May 2021, 9:01 pm
., In re Grice, 974 F.3d 950 (9th Cir. 2020); Cunningham v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:55 am
You’ll also need to respond to the insurance company’s motions, discovery requests, and other court filings. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 3:38 am
Defense counsel then returned to the D.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Stein, No. 073042 Dismissal of indictment of thirteen former partners of the accounting firm KPMG for creating fraudulent tax shelters is affirmed where: 1) the government deprived defendants of their right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment by causing KPMG to place conditions on the advancement of legal fees to defendants, and to cap the fees and ultimately end them; 2) the government failed to cure the Sixth Amendment violation; and 3) no other remedy will return defendants to the… [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Bail refers to cash that is provided to court administration that is returned at the end of the case. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
On January 31, 2002, a Federal Grand Jury in the Western District of Tennessee returned a 22-count indictment against Freddie Peters. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
Realty Corp., 68 AD3d 1009 [2d Dept 2009] [“Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying” respondent’s untimely buyout election]; In re Flushing Off. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm
They file a motion to reopen the proceedings (well, technically their second such motion). [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:03 am
For the most part, the worst thing that could happen to a service accused of helping customers infringe intellectual property was that someone might sue it. [read post]
