Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 701 - 720
of 7,526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2007, 6:11 pm
In re Estate of Holycross This summary was prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 3:45 pm
My speech focused on precarity, youth labour markets, and possible public policy responses to the youth jobs crisis in Canada. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 3:45 pm
My speech focused on precarity, youth labour markets, and possible public policy responses to the youth jobs crisis in Canada. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 12:30 pm
" Friends, the Fifth Amendment bars the gov't from taking private property unless it is for a public use. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:10 pm
I’m talking only about private nuisance here because public nuisance was also dismissed at trial. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:04 pm
There’s the refusal to reduce public access to facilities and officials. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 7:35 pm
We recommend that you review the decision carefully to see which of those niceties may apply to you. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
The Board’s 2023 Decision in In re Uman Diagnostics AB I found the Exam Guide’s reasoning bizarre and unpersuasive but that is beyond the scope of this article. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 12:14 pm
Secondly, they are not bound by prior FSCO decisions and can interpret the laws as they wish. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 5:57 am
The court allowed the suit to proceed over the officer’s claim of public official immunity. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 12:30 pm
Board opposition to public school integration? [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 8:31 am
You’re making decisions about how you’ll vote in an election. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
A prudent and factual response to public misunderstandings about the court’s decisions and role. 2. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:53 am
In that case, the Supreme Court stated: “The presumption of regularity supports the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties[.] [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
In some situations, these disclosures could similarly jeopardize people's standing in their religious communities, and public agencies might argue that they should redact those people's names when releasing information in response to public records requests.[23] [1] See, e.g., In re Anonymous Online Speakers, 661 F.3d 1168, 1173 (9th Cir. 2011) (discussing the "fear of economic or official retaliation") [2] For an example of the threat… [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:12 am
But it's quite another to give that faculty member pride of place -- because of his government service -- in a publication intended to encourage alumni contributions by stressing the laudable public service of one's faculty members. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:30 am
Imagine, for example, a President (or any other public official, see Article VI and the requirement to take an oath of loyalty to the Constitution) who simply refuses. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 3:31 am
The legend across the top of the decision reads, NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS Fortunately, this isn’t an official report, because what Kern County, California prosecutor Robert Alan Murray did was so outrageous, so incredible, as to demand it be reported somewhere. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
No legal effect of the publication of the specification[7] The appellant has not contested that in the present case the decision to grant a patent concerned embodiment C in claim 1 and that the mention of the grant [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 12:30 pm
She's re-arrested for failing to appear in court on that charge. [read post]
