Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 701 - 720
of 889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
Events We draw attention to the Inforrm, Media Standards Trust, Gray’s Inn event on 11 January 2011: “Libel Reform: in the Public’s Interest? [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
See the Inforrm’s Blog’s commentary to the decision here. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
In this feature we revisit older posts which remain of current interest. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
The ramification of the decision in Ehrenfeld v Bin Mahfouz ([2005] EWHC 1156 (QB)) are still continuing to be felt both at home and abroad. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:31 am
But there is a growing consensus that we need to shift, at the very least, towards the balance that emerged after the New York Times Company v Sullivan decision” This “growing consensus” does not, we are afraid, include either Inforrm or the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:24 pm
The Court of Human Rights has held that the fact that singer was well known to the public and been the subject of well publicised rumours about her sexuality did not justify the broadcast of interviews about her relationships and sexuality. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm
One academic commentator, Paul Wragg, takes a different view, on the Inforrm blog. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
In his Report Lord Justice Leveson considered and rejected a proposal that there should be a statutory right of reply or correction. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
We had an Inforrm Post and The Press Gazette had a piece. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:55 pm
A former print journalist, he now contributes to online publications such as Inforrm, Byline Times and openDemocracy. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm
In the case of Niemela v Google (2015 BCSC 1024) the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed a claim for a worldwide interim libel injunction against Google by a Vancouver lawyer who had been subject to online abuse by someone he alleged to have been a former client and entered summary judgment for Google. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:02 pm
Perhaps the most interesting feature of this judgment from our point of view is the first reference to Inforrm in a High Court judgment (see [24]). [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:11 pm
There was an Inforrm post about this. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm
In the case of Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown ([2015] EWHC 2628 (QB))(16 September 2015) Warby J granted a permanent injunction against the unknown operators of the “Solicitors from Hell UK” website. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm
Inforrm have recently commented on the Ministry of Justice’s privacy injunction statistics for 2017 here, where it was reported that there were 2 final privacy injunction proceedings in 2017 and only one that resulted in a final undertaking. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 10:25 am
Our post was cross-posted elsewhere (e.g. at Inforrm, Index on Censorship and Alastair Campbell) and the links were widely shared, so that despite the silence of most of the press the message reached many thousands of people even in the first 24 hours. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
The new “Law Think” blog has a couple of posts which will interest Inforrm readers. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
Like Hugh Tomlinson’s Inforrm post on the case, Rónán Ó Fathaight is critical of the decision, concluding All in all, the judgment in Hoffer is particularly bereft of reasoning: failing to place the statements in the context of a pamphlet, where hyperbole is to be expected; and failing to place importance on the statement being a value-judgment. [read post]
