Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 701 - 720
of 950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm
The Judge does not appear to have been referred to recent “privacy” cases such as Cooper v Turrell ([2011] EWHC 3269 (QB)) which support this approach (see the Inforrm Case comment). [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm
In Week 7 of the Leveson Inquiry, Lord Justice Leveson continued to hear evidence from editors and executives of the press. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm
Inforrm has an article on the ban and the uncertain future of the oversight board. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
Inforrm published commentary on the judgement here and here, 5RB’s response to the judgement can be found here. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 3:11 am
In this context, the Judge confirmed a previously unsettled point of law: suspects in criminal investigations have a prima facie reasonable expectation of privacy (see Professor Callender-Smith’s Inforrm post). [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
Public interest in journalism – a warning not to go too far with Leveson Alex Bailin QC and Edward Craven of Matrix Chambers posted this week on Inforrm’s blog on the need for a public interest defence in investigative journalism, to provide some special protection for the media so that it can perform its vital function. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:09 pm
Raab expanded considerably on the sentiments expressed above in the first chapter of his book The Assault on Liberty: What Went Wrong with Rights (2009). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
HHJ Luba QC’s County Court judgment in Brown v The Commissioner of Police for Metropolis and another (discussed in a recent Inforrm post) lends further support to this view. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:31 am
US Law and Media News Once again, this will be the subject of a separate post From the Blogs The Strasbourg Observers blog has two posts of interest to Inforrm readers. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:24 pm
The Court of Human Rights has held that the fact that singer was well known to the public and been the subject of well publicised rumours about her sexuality did not justify the broadcast of interviews about her relationships and sexuality. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm
There was an Inforrm piece by Brian Cathcart on the hearing. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:16 pm
In the case of Pinto Coelho v Portugal (No.2) ([2016] ECHR 296)(only in French) the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights held (by a 6:1 majority) that the imposition of a fine on a journalist who had published unauthorised audio recordings of a criminal trial was a breach of Article 10. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
We had an Inforrm Post and The Press Gazette had a piece. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 4:03 pm
As Hugh Tomlinson QC notes on the Inforrm blog, it’s a ‘difficult’ case, ‘which is likely to produce a definitive restatement of the principles which apply when a party is seeking to derogate from the principles of open justice’. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
In an INFORRM post Hugh Stephens considers the implications for copyright law due to legislating for internet regulation. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 4:15 pm
The Editor’s Weblog has a piece about the Inforrm/MST event at Gray’s Inn “Libel Reform: in the public’s interest? [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am
Louis Charalambous discusses the issue on the Inforrm’s Blog in light of the Christopher Jefferies contempt of court case. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
Inforrm reports here and here. [read post]
