Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 11,673
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
Today I am back on the legal analysis/interesting case train after a few weeks of getting my new solo practice (thank you to all who have wished me well in this endeavor) up and running and discussing various green building trends and topics. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
United States gives the Supreme Court the opportunity to decide.A few days ago, Peter Kirsanow and I submitted an Amicus Curiae Brief supporting the Defendant's Petition for Certiorari in Metcalf v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:17 am
In states as dissimilar as Florida and Iowa, interest groups are seeking to oust judges because they disagree with a few rulings in controversial cases. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 6:56 am
The last few weeks have brought the usual assortment of cases, some of more interest than others. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:23 pm
S., at 165–168; see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
As I explain in more detail below as I parse the complaint in the United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 12:42 pm
Batson has already been extended to cover gender and a few states have taken it upon themselves to prohibit exercising peremptory challenges based on sexual orientation. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 8:49 am
Gen. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
The opening brief in Michigan v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
The opening brief in Michigan v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
The majority attempted to distinguish Pimentel on a few grounds — the distinction that rings most true to me is that, unlike in the Philippines case, here there is a party (the exclusive licensee) who will protect the State’s interest in the patent right. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:42 am
State ex rel Kutil & Hess v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 6:15 pm
In Webb v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 12:54 pm
I have only skimmed Maryland v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:06 pm
The case provides interesting guidance on the circumstances in which a defendant need prove only part of the defamatory allegations which have been made. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:08 pm
There are a few mildly interesting questions: whether the police need a warrant to attach a GPS tracking device to a car; the scope of the "ministerial exception" to Title VII; and whether FCC indecency regulation is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:17 pm
It is fair to say that the eastern half of the United States is experiencing prolonged heat like few can ever remember. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:34 pm
Commissioner (1989), United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), delivered an interesting judgment in the case of Tölle v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 5:36 am
Traditionally, N.Y. has been one of the few states in the United States that did NOT permit a “bad faith” claim against an insurance carrier except under VERY limited circumstances. [read post]
