Search for: "In Re Mann" Results 701 - 719 of 719
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2007, 10:38 am
Perhaps you’re waiting for a message from X before you can respond to Y. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:54 am
The ubiquitous Merlin Mann has been raving about Scrivener, and commenters on his site seem to concur. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 1:26 pm by Bridget
“The public has to have trust in the criminal justice system, that we’re convicting the right people,” says Hinojosa. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 7:55 am
Yesterday David Mann of the New Albany News & Tribune wrote:[Rep. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 2:42 am
It's as if executives deserve ever-increasing pay packages simply because they're executives. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 3:04 am
The following are just a few of Professor Manne's insights: "They're back! [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 11:31 pm
  Past fundraisers have included Sarah Vowell, Eggers himself, Aimee Mann, Sarah Silverman, and many other talented folks. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:14 am
There's one main problem, says Gartner VP of Research Jeffrey Mann: Users and IT administrators hate them. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 12:41 pm
The matter wals delat with together with another case in re Aerotel. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 6:45 am
Oh, and, according to Manne, "THERE IS NO LIE" in options backdating. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 12:30 pm
Obviously there was some back and forth in the blogosphere yesterday about Jeff Skilling's sentence:  Dave Hoffman (see my comments there); Larry Ribstein (responding to Dave); Ellen Podgor and Peter Henning; and Geoff Manne (with the best title). [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 6:08 pm
Some of my favorite bloggers (Ribstein, Josh Wright and Geoff Manne (aka TOTM) are rather harshly attacking Matt Bodie's recent post about options backdating. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 2:50 pm
Manne & Wright want you to believe there is no lie so strongly they're willing to say it in all caps -- "THERE IS NO LIE. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 2:26 pm
Mann and Ornstein have a number of specific changes to suggest in congressional rules and procedures -- and in lobbying regulations. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 1:45 pm
"  It's a case of false disclosure in order to get something you're not entitled to in the first place.Ribstein claims that the amount of pay was fully disclosed because, as Geoff Manne has pointed out, everyone knew the option strike price when the option itself was disclosed. [read post]