Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 4." Results 701 - 720 of 1,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
LESSER/European Pressphoto Agency) From today’s decision in In re James v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Supreme Court, on June 29, 2015, in a 5 to 4 ruling, held in Michigan v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 5:58 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The court granted Hallmark's special exceptions and required Chambers to re-plead his case. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
 If, on the other hand, the plan is "self-insured" (that is, if the employer itself is ordinarily responsible for payments), the Department of Labor would then inform the plan's third-party administrator (if any) that it is now obliged to offer contraceptive coverage--initially from its own resources--to the organization's employees (and/or students) without imposing any cost-sharing requirements on the eligible organization, its insurance plan, or its employee… [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
FRANCISCO "FRANK" LOPEZ; from Nueces County; 13th Court of Appeals District (13-11-00757-CV, 443 SW3d 196, 06-27-13) The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court. - consolidated with - No. 14-0109 IN RE ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP; from Nueces County; 13th Court of Appeals District (13-11-00757-CV; 13-12-00023-CV, 443 SW3d 196, 06-27-13) The Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 8:52 am by Wolfgang Demino
June 12, 2015) (Opinion by Justice Guzman) The heirs had petitioned the probate court to re-open the estate more than ten years after the estate's administration had closed, alleging that the estate administrator breached fiduciary duties and fraudulently concealed information about the estate’s assets. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 8:52 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
June 12, 2015) (Opinion by Justice Guzman)   The heirs had petitioned the probate court to re-open the estate more than ten years after the estate's administration had closed, alleging that the estate administrator breached fiduciary duties and fraudulently concealed information about the estate’s assets. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
And since there is no greater longshot than a cert. petition, this should be a good week for relists. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:24 am by Paul Bost
Brack requested the suspension of his prosecution of the application in order to petition to cancel the prior ORANGECELLO registration, which petition was successful by default. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:24 pm by Paul Bost
Brack requested the suspension of his prosecution of the application in order to petition to cancel the prior ORANGECELLO registration, which petition was successful by default. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Respondent on April 12, 1994 filed a motion returnable April 27, 1994 seeking re-argument of the dispositional order dated April 7, 1994. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
 In order for her application to be granted, plaintiff must first demonstrate that she is unable to have the summons personally served on defendant, the method of service initially prescribed by DRL § 232(a). [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:00 am
Answer#1 According to the USCIS, on Monday, May 4, 2015 they completed the data entry of all Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 H-1B cap- subjected petitions that have been selected randomly through the computer generated process. [read post]