Search for: "In re J. W." Results 701 - 720 of 2,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2024, 2:50 pm by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Cozzi-DiGiovanni, 14 NE 3d 729 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 5th Div. 2014 The 503(j) standard of awarding fees from a party to an opposing counsel is completely different than the 508(c) standard of awarding fees from a party to their own counsel. 503(j) awards attorney’s fees based on who got what in the divorce. [read post]
In its opinion, the Court explained that “[w]hat constitutes ‘merchandise’. . . can be conceptualized as a continuum. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The current system Hence the statutory re-boot in the light of T which is the subject of this challenge. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
 W is for Wafer, Waffleand Wathelet If the CJEU follows this opinion, then potentially yes. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 12:57 am by Sebastian Conrad
Ferner wäre ein Aufklärungsgespräch selbst ohne die Erklärung des Bieters, keine eigenen Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen vereinbaren zu wollen, in Frage gekommen. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Policy, Practice and Privatized Prison Telephones in Saskatchewan (2019) 8:1 Can J Hum Rts 1 Sarah Buhler is an Associate Professor at the University of Saskatchewan College of Law. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am by Heidi Henson
In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court has held the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act to be constitutional (National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius, June 28, 2012, Roberts, J). [read post]