Search for: "In the Interest of D. M. (Dissenting Opinion)"
Results 701 - 720
of 727
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Here is the 12/17/03 opinion in D & M Healthcare, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:39 am
See what you think.P.S. - It's not mentioned in the opinion/dissent. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:50 pm
I have strong opinions on this. [read post]
22 May 2007, 11:48 am
In the case of In re Roberto D. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
In evaluating Comer's continuing decision to waive his appeals, a psychiatrist found that in the weeks after the execution of Vickers, Robert Comer "had no interest in anything. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:18 am
I'm sorry Professor Paulsen, but this one will actually bum you out.The misperception is understandable. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:41 pm
NMCCA 200500939, slip op. at 3 (N-M. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 5:43 pm
I'm not sure I'd give that analysis to my dog. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 5:43 pm
I'm not sure I'd give that analysis to my dog. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 3:42 am
He dissented in Roe and wrote the majority opinion in Bowers v Hardwick. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 8:23 am
Good or bad as a doctrine, at the very least, the Court should acknowledge it is overruling precedent, especially when the Court takes the precedent's dissent and makes it the majority opinion, as Justice Kennedy did here with his dissent (adding some lovely new justifications). [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:36 pm
Well, you guessed it:Judges appointed by Republican presidents voted to deny inmate appeals 85 percent of the time.Judges appointed by Democrats voted to grant at least some portion of those appeals 75 percent of the time.Republican appointees dissented from majority opinions 25 times, always arguing against the inmate. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
Kennedy was in vehement dissent in both cases.) [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
Now that we're a few days removed from the decision, I am even more convinced that Justice Thomas' concurring opinion in Carhart II is the most important, most cryptic, and most interesting opinion in the case. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:21 am
I look forward to reading how Kennedy wrote himself out of his earlier position, and the dissents will be quite interesting - 2006 Term Opinions - Gonzales v Carhart (pdf) The NYTimes AP link is a little longer — Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Abortion Procedure — pdf Also Dahlia Lithwick’s Father Knows Best Later: Cass Sunstein’s Ginsburg’s dissent may yet prevail - pdf [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:55 am
" In the Interest of Angel Lace M., supra at 683. be used. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 1:36 pm
Thompson and Harold D. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
It's an interesting argument. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Justice Alito (joined by AMK and SGB) penned the lead dissent, masterfully demonstrating that the majority's opinion is on a collision course with the Booker remedial opinion. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
Aaron M. [read post]
