Search for: "Jacob v. Jacob" Results 701 - 720 of 2,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2021, 4:25 pm by Patricia Salkin
This post was authored by Sebastian Perez, Touro College Jacob D. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 12:42 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick updates you regarding the status of K-1 visa interview scheduling at U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 2:08 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
K Visa Applicants Remain in Limbo Outside of the named plaintiffs in the case Milligan v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:52 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
They also get qualified immunity on the cavity search claim.The case is Gonzalez v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 8:52 am by Christiana Wayne
Anderson shared an episode of Rational Security 2.0 which covers the legacy of Sept. 11, the future of the U.S. drone program and more: Kurup explained the background and procedural history of Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 6:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the defendant was convicted of murder and has already spent quite some time in the big house, but the Second Circuit finds the state trial court denied him a fair trial.The case is Scrimo v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
 * Book Review: Sir Robin Jacob tells us a story about "IP and Other Things"Annsley reviews Sir Robin Jacob's IP and Other Things, a 500-page collection of the famous Judge's essays and lectures. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:48 am by Eugene Volokh
I thought I'd repeat a post I wrote up about this case last year, when it was handed down; see also Jacob Sullum's post from yesterday on this subject. [* * *] From Friday's [June 28, 2019] Seventh Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:29 am by Zoe Read, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court found that Jacobs and Bloy v Motor Insurers’ Bureau [2013] EWCA Civ 1543 should be overruled, because otherwise the measure of damages would vary depending on who the injured party pursued. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Claim preclusion bars plaintiff’s claims against Jacob Zamansky as well as Zamansky LLC because both were named as defendants in the 2017 action and Jacob Zamansky is in privity with Zamansky LLC (see Rojas v Romanoff, 186 AD3d 103, 108, 112 [1st Dept 2020]). [read post]