Search for: "James v. Scott"
Results 701 - 720
of 923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm
Shannon, Opinion: Executing Scott Panetti would be an appalling injustice, Austin American-Statesman (Oct. 22, 2022). https://www.statesman.com/story/opinion/columns/your-voice/2022/10/22/opinion-executing-scott-panetti-would-be-an-appalling-injustice/69581019007/ Prof. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Tallent v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:19 am
According to the SEC website, the following are xamples of SEC enforcement actions against Ponzi schemes: 2014 · Neal V. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Science, Scholarship, and Policymaking Scott Burris, Temple University, Science, Interdisciplinarity, and Health Law Scholarship Kevin Outterson, Boston University, Bad Science Leads to Bad Legal Scholarship Joanna Sax, California Western School of Law, Consumer Perceptions of Risk in Various Areas of Biotechnology C. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:01 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am
Allen, Rainhard Bengez, Floris Bex, Scott Brewer, Craig Callen, James Franklin, David Hamer, Bruce Hay, Joseph Laronge, D. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
AUTHOR Boyle, James, 1959- TITLE The public domain : enclosing the commons of the mind / James Boyle. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm
Allen, Rainhard Bengez, Floris Bex, Scott Brewer, Craig Callen, James Franklin, David Hamer, Bruce Hay, Joseph Laronge, D. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:34 pm
From Westenbroek v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:08 pm
Mahmood, Constitutional Forum, Centre for Constitutional Studies, Forthcoming ‘Newspaper Libel: With Special Emphasis on Indian Case Law’, Nayan Banerjee, National Law School of India University (NLSIU) ‘Defamation Outside Reputation: Proposals for the Reform of English Law‘, Eric Descheemaeker, University of Edinburgh – School of Law, U. of Edinburgh School of Law Working Paper No. 2011/41 ‘New York Times Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 10:18 am
Star v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
Having cited Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 and other cases on the topic, the court in its judgment emphasised the importance of the principle of open justice (that justice should be seen to be done) and ruled that, by failing to consult the judiciary before excluding members of the public from the courtroom during the trial, the magistrates court staff had acted unlawfully, and in consequence no valid proceedings had taken place. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during May 2022 Ten consistory court judgments were circulated in May, and those featured in this round-up relate to: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Privy Council Business, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
2 May 2008, 9:03 am
The lethal injection index, with full coverage of Baze v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:10 am
Among the more interesting briefs filed on behalf of respondents is an amicus brief for Stephen McAllister and Scott Paul (with Erik Jaffe and James Heilpern on brief as counsel) argues that existing precedents on presidential immunity lack a textual basis and that, if the Supreme Court's majority is to be as textualist as it purports to be, it should not extend or build upon this non-textual precedent. [read post]
