Search for: "Jordan v. State" Results 701 - 720 of 1,683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm by John A. Emmons
  Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith examined the legal efficacy of the U.S. government prosecuting entities owned by foreign states, in the context of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Benjamin Pollard
Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s decision in Egbert v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:56 pm by Russell Beck
In most states, trade secrets and confidential information (among certain other things) are legitimate business interests that may be protected through a noncompetition agreement (as well as through other restrictive covenants). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Mesa, which “asks whether there is a remedy for a Mexican citizen killed when a Border Patrol agent in the United States opens fire on someone in Mexico,” and Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
Aug. 24, 1990) (rejecting argument that defense expert should have been excluded for lack of certainty; “[r]easonable medical probability is for the fact finder to determine, and testimony regarding the possible causes of an injury is admissible”) (unpublished; applying Texas law); Jordan v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:25 am by Andrew Frisch
In other words, [*5]  they “‘are not a penalty exacted by the law, but rather compensation to the employee occasioned by the delay in receiving wages due caused by the employer’s violation of the FLSA.'” Jordan v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:25 am by Andrew Frisch
In other words, [*5]  they “‘are not a penalty exacted by the law, but rather compensation to the employee occasioned by the delay in receiving wages due caused by the employer’s violation of the FLSA.'” Jordan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
Seeking an ArrowArrow declarations can be granted: Fujifilm v AbbVieGuestKat Eibhlin Vardy discusses Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co., Ltd v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 1, which involves two appeals, both raising the question of whether a Court can grant a so called ‘Arrow declaration’, i.e. a declaration that “a product was old or obvious in patent law terms at a particular date”.Guest Post - China's Patent BoomYangjin Li… [read post]