Search for: "King v. United States Government" Results 701 - 720 of 1,659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Title IX states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be . [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
United States The newest version of Melania Trump’s defamation claim she has filed against the Daily Mail leaves out a controversial portion of the original — a section that argued the first lady’s earning potential as a brand spokeswoman would be irretrievably damaged by the defamation. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:48 am by Joy Waltemath
“Even where the Government declines to intervene, ‘the United States is the real party in interest in any [FCA] suit. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm by Jamie Baker
Its more than 2,700 members practice throughout the United States, Canada and other foreign countries. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 12:00 pm by Larry Tolchinsky
  These are laws, rules, and regulations that may have been passed by federal, state, county, or city governments regarding the condition and upkeep of the property. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:07 pm by David Kopel
The United States Constitution comprehensively protects the American people from the types of abuses that necessitated the Revolution. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
President Donald Trump’s Executive Order on domestic safety eliminates Privacy Act protection for foreigners, as it directs U.S. government agencies to “ensure that their privacy policies exclude persons who are not United States citizens or lawful permanent residents from the protections of the Privacy Act regarding personally identifiable information,” but only if doing so is “consistent with applicable law. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, we see judges engaged in principled deliberation under a governing ethos of rational consistency with precedents, and working-pure the principles underlying those precedents, in a way that would have made Dworkin proud -- if he had read them. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:01 pm
Vermillion and the City appeal, arguing that the superior court erred because article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution and the First and Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution protect the requested documents.West v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:08 am by Dr Christy Shucksmith
Humanitarianism v. the State: Migration as an issue of national security or human security. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:11 am by Susan Hennessey
It prohibits any “Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States]” from accepting “any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]